Evaluating user request
The user posted a Chinese sentence about differences between the AFC Champions League and J League. It translates to a statement that seems like a news headline. They might want a summary, article content, or further details like analysis or a rewrite. Asking a clarifying question could be a good start. I should be proactive and ask if they need a summary, translation, or context about the mentioned leagues. I'll be mindful of the content policy too.Clarifying user needs
The instructions mention that I could run terminal commands for specific requests, but the user didn't ask for that. Instead, I should clarify their needs, perhaps asking if they want an explanation, translation, or quick analysis. I can provide insights on the AFC Champions League versus J League regarding intensity, physicality, and speed, while avoiding actual quotes. Offering options in Chinese might be useful, and I can summarize key differences and tactical suggestions to keep it concise. That way, I can truly help!Drafting a concise response
Alright, I need to mention aspects like VAR and how much physical contact referees allow. It seems like I should keep my response to about 4-6 bullets while still being concise, but maybe pushing it to 6-10 bullets would work better.

I'll start with a brief acknowledgment: "这是条新闻标题." Then I can ask, "你想了解哪方面?" with some options.
The key points could include:

I'll also add a short note about the Sanfrecce Hiroshima style and conclude with the question about needing original sources or data. This should work well!
这是条新闻标题。你更想要哪种帮助?
要点解读(通用)
前锋应对建议
需要我: